How content earns trust

Editorial policy

A transparent publishing standard for a high-stakes healthcare topic.

Source hierarchy

We prioritize health authorities, regulators, official transplant programmes, recognized professional bodies, peer-reviewed literature, and direct institutional sources. Marketing claims and unsourced comparisons are not treated as evidence.

Clinical review

Phase 1 introductory content is clearly marked as awaiting independent clinical approval. Before expansion into detailed clinical guidance, named qualified reviewers and a documented sign-off process must be approved.

Corrections and review dates

Published records include dates and source panels. Material errors should be corrected promptly, with affected pages reviewed for related inaccuracies. Country and hospital claims will require scheduled re-verification before publication.

Independence and disclosure

Editorial conclusions must remain independent of referral, partnership, or commercial arrangements. Any relevant relationship will be clearly disclosed near the affected content.

What we will not publish

We will not publish unverified success rates, rankings, cost promises, access guarantees, donor availability, waiting-time claims, or content that could facilitate unlawful transplantation.

Patient safety

Navigation with firm boundaries

MedTransplant provides independent education and navigation. We do not source organs or donors, influence allocation, or promise clinical acceptance.

Licensed transplant centres make all clinical decisions, and national laws always apply.